Monday, July 21, 2008

Focusing on the Bright and Shiny Object

When I started my current position, I was under the mindset that bright shiny objects were the goal. Creating the next revolutionary recruitment strategy was the way to go. Something that would attract the target audience, and still create efficiencies in the office was exactly what was needed to successfully attract high school students.

So I began to jump on board with every new tech tool and start-up available. I setup Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter, and Zinch profiles. I started tinkering around with all the settings, exploring the APIs and posting various pieces of content, all while assessing the possibilities for recruitment.

I then bought into the hype of how Universities needed social media managers because the corporate website was going to be extinct. The future of recruiting is through Facebook, YouTube, and elsewhere. I began to prepare for the revolution.

What?! Wait, why would our corporate (or in higher ed's case, institution) site go extinct? It remains the primary source of information for prospective students, and current students must use it on a regular basis to check class notes, communicate with professors, register for classes and check out upcoming on-campus events. News agencies link to our press releases, library research at the very least starts on our sites, and faculty and staff default their start page to us. We have some of the highest trafficked, repeatedly visited sites of any industry.

We have a consumer goldmine. Our students are engaged in our brand for (usually) at least four years. Identities are created in our institutions that live on as alums. Life-changing decisions are made on our campuses, and networks are created. Our students stay loyal to our brand, and invest heavily in it. If our institution's website goes extinct it's because we gave up on it.

In reality, we should be extending our websites. All the time and energy focused on Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and the likes should be repackaged and applied toward the experiences created on our sites. So much work must be done to break down walled-gardens created by portals and disparate databases. User-experiences need to be consistent, with accessible, applied conventions; timely, personalized and accurate data needs to be presented appropriately; and enrollment processes need streamlined. There is so much foundational work to be done our institutions' sites.

Social networks are awesome, Facebook is not. Online video is great, YouTube channels aren't. Instant messaging is crucial, Twitter isn't.

4 thoughts:

Anonymous said...

Actually...

I would think that something else is happening. The corporate / institutional website remains important, but the focus is shifting away from it.

A university's Wikipedia entry is likely to be of increasing importance, its audiovisual echo across all the various social website is cranking up, the blog cloud is casting its shadows of first-hand commentary...

The more marketeers enter the HE industry, the less trust institutional websites will engender in the public. After all, institutional websites are all about spin and marketing hype.

If I want to find out about a digital camera I am interested in buying, I will briefly look at the corporate websites at the pretty posters and ads. And then I will head over to dpreview, check out the photos it produced on FlickR, and see what technorati has to say about it. And I don't usually spend more than £200 on a camera.

I will trust the commentary of (perceived) peers over the corporate spin any day.

Now imagine what I'll do if I want to select a place to lighten my pockets by £10,000 and three to four years of my life...

Karlyn said...

AWESOME post!!!! I felt like I was the only person who thought like this lol. I would add an asterisk though - once you have your institutional website covered and it's basically a well-oiled machine than I see nothing wrong with expanding into other areas. But its got to be a secondary goal.

Also, I want to really disagree with the comment above me - "the more marketeers enter the HE industry, the less trust institutional websites will engender in the public. After all, institutional websites are all about spin and marketing hype."

This person clearly has no idea what GOOD marketing is. The last thing good marketing wants to be is hype. Good marketing is about telling your institutions story and giving people the tools to do things they want to do.

Big Glorious Mess said...

Great blog, Seth. Where I wind up on the social media vs institutional site issue depends mostly on when I'm due for my next shot of espresso.

But one thing I'd like to add to your very lucid list of advantages we have on the web as higher ed institutions is the goldmine of our primary content. Field research video from students and faculty. Blogs. Video lecture content. Published research. All of this primary content is the real wealth we have to offer, and however we can bring this material to the surface of our institutional site or spread it around (and take credit for it) on social sites, increases our status and thought leadership as an organization.

Melissa Cheater said...

*echo from the back row* GREAT POST! if we keep repeating it's the culture & the concept, not the facebook.com and youtube.com; and keep saying evolution NOT revolution, maybe eventually people will get it.